Discussion:
Blog with summaries of posts
(too old to reply)
John Sleigh
2006-12-07 06:32:16 UTC
Permalink
I have posted three summaries of recent threads and a philosophy statement
on the reasons for a blog summarizing threads on this newsgroup at
http://toastmastersfaq.blogspot.com/

The first posts are indicative of the intended content and the way they will
be presented.

Your feedback, ideas and contributions would be appreciated.

When Nigel asked about summarizing posts to the group, the agreement that it
was OK was universal. I am assuming that stands for me too. If not, let me
know.

John
Joy
2006-12-07 08:02:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Sleigh
I have posted three summaries of recent threads and a philosophy statement
on the reasons for a blog summarizing threads on this newsgroup at
http://toastmastersfaq.blogspot.com/
The first posts are indicative of the intended content and the way they
will be presented.
Your feedback, ideas and contributions would be appreciated.
When Nigel asked about summarizing posts to the group, the agreement that
it was OK was universal. I am assuming that stands for me too. If not, let
me know.
John
It is certainly fine with me. I appreciate your going to all the trouble to
do it, and don't mind a bit if and when you include something I've written.

Joy
TracyT
2006-12-07 15:29:44 UTC
Permalink
I think it's a great idea. A lot of times the threads here get off on
tangeants. When I go back and try to find information on a topic, I
often find myself filtering through all sorts of non-related info in
the same thread as the topic I was looking for.

Tracy
Post by John Sleigh
I have posted three summaries of recent threads and a philosophy statement
on the reasons for a blog summarizing threads on this newsgroup at
http://toastmastersfaq.blogspot.com/
The first posts are indicative of the intended content and the way they will
be presented.
Your feedback, ideas and contributions would be appreciated.
When Nigel asked about summarizing posts to the group, the agreement that it
was OK was universal. I am assuming that stands for me too. If not, let me
know.
John
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...